例句與造句

1. First, when Congress " creates " rights, it can require those asserting such rights to go through an Article I tribunal.
2. Second, Congress can create non-Article III tribunals to help Article III courts deal with their workload, but only if the Article I tribunals are under the control of the Article III courts.
3. Judges in Article I tribunals attached to executive branch agencies are referred to as administrative law judges ( ALJs ) and are generally considered to be part of the executive branch even though they exercise quasi-judicial powers.
4. In 1926, Congress responded to the increasing number and complexity of customs cases by replacing the Board of General Appraisers with the United States Customs Court, an independent Article I tribunal, retaining the jurisdiction and powers of the Board of General Appraisers.
5. The Supreme Court most thoroughly delineated the permissible scope of Article I tribunals in " Northern Pipeline Construction Co . v . Marathon Pipe Line Co . ", striking down the statute that created the original U . S . bankruptcy court.
6. It's difficult to find article i tribunals in a sentence. 用article i tribunals造句挺難的
7. The Supreme Court later noted, in " Commodity Futures Trading Commission v . Schor ", that parties to litigation could voluntarily waive their right to an Article III tribunal, and thereby submit themselves to a binding judgment from an Article I tribunal.
8. The Supreme Court noted in " Commodity Futures Trading Commission v . Schor ", 478 U . S . 833 ( 1986 ), that parties to litigation may voluntarily waive their right to an Article III tribunal and thereby submit themselves to a binding judgment from an Article I tribunal.
9. However, the Supreme Court later noted in " Stern v . Marshall ", 564 U . S . _ _ _ ( 2011 ), that a party's right to an Article III tribunal is not always voluntarily waiveable in an Article I tribunal for suits at common law.
10. The Supreme Court most thoroughly delineated the permissible scope of Article I tribunals in " Northern Pipeline Co . v . Marathon Pipe Line Co . ", 458 U . S . 50 ( 1982 ), striking down the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 that created the original U . S . bankruptcy courts.
11. Similarly, in " Granfinanciera, S . A . v . Nordberg ", 492 U . S . 33 ( 1989 ), the Court noted that a litigant's right to jury trial under the Seventh Amendment is also not generally waivable in an Article I tribunal for suits at common law.
12. We held in Schor that, although a litigant had consented to bring a state-law counterclaim before an Article I tribunal, 478 U . S ., at 849, we would nonetheless choose to consider his Article III challenge, because " where these Article III limitations are at issue, notions of consent and waiver cannot be dispositive ."
13. The existence of Article I tribunals has been controversial, and their power has been challenged before the United States Supreme Court, which has determined that Article I tribunals may exist, but that their power must be circumscribed and, when a potential deprivation of life, liberty, or property interest is involved, their decisions are often subject to ultimate review in an Article III court.
14. The existence of Article I tribunals has been controversial, and their power has been challenged before the United States Supreme Court, which has determined that Article I tribunals may exist, but that their power must be circumscribed and, when a potential deprivation of life, liberty, or property interest is involved, their decisions are often subject to ultimate review in an Article III court.